Infrastructure is the least used and least understood of EB-5’s three reserved visa categories—and it extends well beyond roads and bridges to include affordable housing, public facilities, and environmental remediation.
Created by the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022, the category is defined by two requirements that set it apart from every other EB-5 project.
“The two things that make [infrastructure projects] very different… [are that] the JCE must be a government entity, which could be federal, state, or local. And… the second is that it must be public works,” said Julia Lin, an attorney at Lin Andrews LLP, in a recent webinar hosted by EB5Investors.com.
The job-creating entity, or JCE, undertakes the business activity that generates the required EB-5 jobs. The new commercial enterprise, or NCE, is where investors place their capital.
The government’s role must be substantive. It cannot simply support a development, issue permits, or appear at a groundbreaking; it must receive and administer the capital tied to the infrastructure investment.
Lin was joined by Tang Tang of KT Capital Group and Jeffrey Powers of the Bunker Hill Infrastructure Project. The panelists agreed that viable infrastructure deals share four traits: a committed government partner, a clear public benefit, credible job creation, and sound legal and financial structuring. Those conditions make the projects rare—and, the panel argued, potentially advantageous for the investors and developers who find them.
Infrastructure means more than roads and bridges
The public works requirement is not confined to traditional civil works. Remediating contaminated land or building a public hospital can qualify.
“Affordable housing is a public good because it serves a certain under-market group of people… for a city and for an area,” Tang said.
Powers added that larger developments can combine roads, sewers, water utilities, transit hubs, public spaces, community facilities, and public housing in a single project.
The panel cautioned investors not to assume a project is ineligible because its principal asset is a building. Nor does calling a project “infrastructure” in marketing materials make it one. Investors should review the project documentation, the government’s role, the public works rationale, and the contractual relationships among the JCE, NCE, and regional center.
For developers and regional centers, the category may open a path for work already embedded in a public development plan: municipal affordable housing, environmental remediation, public facilities, or transit-oriented development.
Tang noted that state and local legislation can help establish that a project qualifies as a public good. In practice, sponsors may need to tie the EB-5 structure to existing statutes, programs, regulations, or development plans that recognize the activity as public works.
A preexisting public mandate, a documented procurement process, and a clearly defined government role help separate genuine public works from private development labeled as infrastructure.
The underused set-aside may offer a visa-availability edge
Infrastructure receives 2% of the annual EB-5 allocation. That is far smaller than the 20% reserved for rural projects and 10% for high-unemployment areas, but demand has been correspondingly light.
“Everybody’s rushing towards Rural and High unemployment, but not a lot of people know about infrastructure projects… Basically, the visa category is not being used,” Lin said.
Because the reserved categories remain current for most nationalities, including China and India, investors from heavily backlogged countries may reach the visa stage sooner than they would in the unreserved category. Under the RIA, reserved visas left unused in a fiscal year roll over to the reserved categories the following year; if they go unused again, they move into the unreserved pool.
Visa availability affects how long an investor waits between petition approval and the final step toward a green card, which is what makes infrastructure a potential alternative to more heavily marketed categories. It can also be a strategic option for regional centers pursuing approval through Form I-956F.
“The ability to have a project that is I-956F approved and ready to go, with the 2% set-aside, means little to no wait time on a visa, which can be very attractive for potential investors,” Powers said.
For families with children approaching 21, lower backlog risk carries particular weight, since delays can cost a derivative beneficiary eligibility. The panelists cautioned, however, that current availability does not guarantee future availability: it shifts with new projects, petitions, volume, and policy changes. Investors should consult qualified immigration counsel about their own circumstances.
Limited supply can also differentiate sponsors. Rural and high-unemployment offerings compete in a crowded field; an approved infrastructure project may appeal to investors looking for a reserved category with lighter demand. Lin cautioned that few government entities have the capacity or appetite to serve as a JCE, given the complexity of administering funds across the project’s life. That barrier limits competition—and protects the niche.
Government involvement adds oversight, but due diligence still matters
Government participation brings real oversight. It does not make an EB-5 investment risk-free.
The capital moves from the NCE to the public agency, which holds the funds in an account under its control, reviews construction activity, and determines when to disburse into the project.
Lin said the government entity’s role as JCE includes receiving funds from the NCE and administering and completing the project. The entity must also have a contractual relationship with a regional center or with an NCE sponsored by one—meaning the structure has to run through the regional center program rather than as a direct investment.
Powers described that level of involvement as a central reason infrastructure projects are difficult to assemble. “There’s so much oversight; the government has to be involved…and there has to be the public good,” he said.
Government participation is not a repayment guarantee. Investors still need to read the offering documents and transaction agreements to determine which entity owes repayment, what cash flow supports it, and what remedies exist if the project underperforms. Tang emphasized that the exit arrangement remains “project-by-project dependent.”
The job creation requirement is also unchanged: each investor must be credited with at least 10 qualifying jobs. Lin said jobs in infrastructure deals are calculated under the same regional center framework used for rural, high-unemployment, and unreserved projects, with economic models drawing on eligible capital expenditures, including construction and project improvements.
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the publisher, its employees. or its affiliates. The information found on this website is intended to be general information; it is not legal or financial advice. Specific legal or financial advice can only be given by a licensed professional with full knowledge of all the facts and circumstances of your particular situation. You should seek consultation with legal, immigration, and financial experts prior to participating in the EB-5 program Posting a question on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. All questions you post will be available to the public; do not include confidential information in your question.
